Friday, February 27, 2009

8. In Conclusion

(To read this from the beginning, start with Replicating the Roswell Rock , then follow the links.) Updated version HERE
Roswell rock and replica comparisonA final comparison. The original is on the right.

It would usually be easy to allow the bitter end of an experience like this cast a dark shadow over the whole thing. Putting effort into something you enjoy, that ultimately goes unrewarded can certainly be disappointing, but it hardly seems to matter in this case. I think what was so intriguing (and rewarding all by itself) was that I managed to do something that many people were saying could only be done by aliens - How often does a person get a chance to do something as odd as that? It also resulted in some unexpected interactions with some very interesting people. So in conclusion I would like to give special thanks to some of them.

To UFO Investigator Chuck Zukowski - for actually buying a stone / To Crop Circle Investigator Andreas Muller for featuring my work in an article on his website - much appreciated! / And to Author Gary Val Tenuta for his words of support, and for trading me a signed copy of his book "The Ezekiel Code" for a Roswell Rock replica - Very Cool!

Additional thanks must go to my wife, who was also "very cool" and patient while I once again 'went off on one of my tangents'. Thanks also to those of you who bought rocks - hang on to them, looks like they might be rare indeed.

Oh - and one more thing... please don't leave them lying around just anywhere!

alien face carved on a rock

2 comments:

  1. Very interesting. I actually also made it: From clay.
    And while doing it, I noticed something strange: The circumference of the two medium sized circles is not even: One side is shallower than the other, on both medium-sized circles. I wonder how that is connected to sandblasting...
    Best regards

    arit

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, it has also been observed that part of the design on the original has vertical sides, while other parts are less vertical - more like a bevel. This resulted from sandblasting from an angle, as opposed to straight on. It also contributed to the uneven depth as you mentioned, although, you dont have to blast crookedly to do that, just unevenly.

    I'd love to see a picture of your clay version. Is that possible?

    ReplyDelete